While the cold of the winter seems to slow time here in Copenhagen, world affairs continue to move ahead in dramatic fashion.
The events in Haiti made any hopes of a smooth transition into a new decade wishful thinking. And there is still buzz even here about the Massachusetts Senate race, as it appears voters are looking to lash out at anybody remotely close to responsible for making political decisions.
Meanwhile, it seems that any time I read about economic growth or investment it’s the creation of some massive wind farm being built in Brazil, growth in China exceeding 10%, or even how Uruguay is producing the next great wave of Hollywood hit-makers.
Here in Europe there is a lot of speculation about what it all means for the Obama Administration, as well as the overall direction of the US. No need for me to suffer through Cokie Roberts, George Will and Sam Donaldson (warning: click here at your own peril) I get to see European anchors on the tube speculating about all this stuff. The good news is I can’t understand most of what they are saying, just like those guys on the Sunday morning news shows. But what I do pick up is that even overseas where President Obama enjoys great support, there is a growing perception that the rest of the world is catching up to the US and that the current Administration is faltering. It’s not just the economic downturn – everyone is getting hit – it’s more the sense that the US is no longer the dominant force on the global stage and has in fact lost its footing at the top of the mountain.
The President’s State of the Union offers a chance for him to shape the national debate by putting America’s focus back on track and away from the finger-pointing and name-calling that makes up political discourse right about now. He’s a “socialist.” They’re “tea baggers.” Just brutal.
So in all humility, but in the spirit of the upcoming State of the Union address, a few thoughts from the cheap seats in anticipation of the speech:
The beginning, middle, and the end of the speech has to be about jobs. I know I’m not saying anything that nearly every political consultant and so-called message guru on CNN is probably saying right now. That by itself doesn’t mean it isn’t right, and it definitely doesn’t mean that the White House and Congress need to talk job creation at the expense of broader policy objectives. In fact, virtually every major policy initiative under consideration and attack is in some ways connected to jobs. Health Care: healthy population and efficient delivery system means cost savings and productivity. Climate: We need to lead on green technologies because it is a huge center of growth and opportunity for our people. And please, will everyone just stop using the words “cap and trade”? It’s total bullshit to most of us. Education: If we don’t invest in kids and challenge all involved (teachers unions, parents, and the bureaucracy) to do better, we are screwed. And we have no chance at getting the jobs of the future. Simple, huh?
Unify the country around a common threat: Of course, Al Qaeda and the rest of those wing-nuts are a common threat. The President will mention our “renewed and vigilant efforts to fight terrorism” in the speech and rightfully get a standing O from both sides of the aisle. But another kind of threat that needs to be articulated is that the rest of the world is going to eat our lunch economically if we don’t get things in gear. China is experiencing over 10% growth. Countries in the Persian Gulf are looking at ways to get off dependence on Persian Gulf oil (I know, crazy but it’s true). Here in Europe, despite a crapper economy there continue to be pockets of growth and actual confidence in the future. So…time to rally the troops, take on the rest of the world and do what we do best. Innovate and compete.
Reject the Supreme Court’s decision on campaign finance and call for “unilateral disarmament” by the Democratic party while challenging Republicans to do same. After the decision pundits on the left and right predictably lined up calling it either a “crushing blow to democracy,” or one that “frees American business from the yoke of second-class citizenship.” I’ll take a stand here: allowing unlimited corporate and labor union money in elections is just plain insane. But that’s just me. I know the argument in many places will be that “we can’t fight with one hand tied behind our backs” so we’re going to play by the rules as they are. That approach will lead to some very bad decisions by politicians and their consultants and even worse public policy. Besides, running crappy :30 second spots and buying a ton of media intended to overwhelm voters just won’t work anymore. Great brands don’t gain market share just because they beat their competitors into submission. The key to elections are good candidates with effective messages that connect with voters. And believe me, not a single major candidate on either side of the aisle is having any problem raising enough money to at least be competitive on television. “Just say no” people. It will pay off for you in the long run.
So Mr. President, there are a few thoughts. Good luck tomorrow.












